Released
on Sunday, January 3, the Commission’s report
(in French) confirmed that serious irregularities, such as voting without
proper identification or with false identification numbers, were widespread.
The Commission also said that instances of fraud and the manipulation of votes
occurred during the October 25 elections. The report, however, shied
away from assessing the full scale of problems on election day and their
impact on the credibility of results for the presidential race. The Commission’s
recommendations included “refurbishing” of the CEP, the resignation of CEP
members accused of corruption, evaluating
and properly training election workers and initiating a political dialogue
between the main political actors.
The
Commission was strongly critical of the CEP, which according to the report “no
longer enjoys the credibility necessary to continue the process without the
risk of plunging the nation into an even greater crisis.” Shortly after the
report was made public, Council member Ricardo Augustin tendered his
resignation, while dissident member Jaccéus Joseph threatened
to resign if his fellow council members did not accept the recommendations.
Commissioners
were divided on the appropriate conclusions to be drawn from the report.
Commission spokesman Rosny Desroches said after the release of the report that
there had been only minor irregularities on October 25 that did not affect the
final results, while Commissioners Gédéon Jean and Euvonie Georges Auguste told
journalists that a full recount of the vote was necessary to determine the
results’ integrity. Jean refused to sign the Commission’s report because it
failed to recommend a full recount, a stance which was supported
by the human rights group RNDDH.
The
G-8 responded to the Commission’s report with astatement
calling for a provisional government and the dismissal of the CEP. The statement
challenged the Executive to follow the conclusions of its own Commission and ended
by reiterating the G-8’s demand for an independent commission and for an
in-depth and thorough inquiry into the whole electoral process. The Group
expressed its support for peaceful popular demonstrations
and called for the formation of a united opposition front while appealing to
the Executive to respect the people’s will and the “verdict of the ballot
boxes.”
On Wednesday, January 6, President Martelly delivered a Message to the Nation in which he affirmed that he will transfer power on February 7. Martelly emphasized that there will be no transition government and warned that this would lead to “more misery and chaos.” “Those who want a provisional government are working to their own advantage,” he stated. The same day, Martelly issued an executive order setting the date for the second round of presidential elections for January 24.
On Wednesday, January 6, President Martelly delivered a Message to the Nation in which he affirmed that he will transfer power on February 7. Martelly emphasized that there will be no transition government and warned that this would lead to “more misery and chaos.” “Those who want a provisional government are working to their own advantage,” he stated. The same day, Martelly issued an executive order setting the date for the second round of presidential elections for January 24.
On
January 7, LAPEH candidate Jude Célestin announced that he refused
to stand in the second round of the presidential elections. According to his spokesman,
Célestin will not take part in any elections until the recommendations of the
Independent Electoral Evaluation Commission are fully put into place. Célestin
stated in a letter that he saw no “efforts being made to improve transparency
in the final round by enacting the sweeping changes ordered by the five-member
commission.” Célestin’s other demands and conditions to his participation were
the dismissal of all those accused of electoral fraud as well as a 30-days long
period to campaign.
In
contrast, the OAS Electoral Observation Mission welcomed
the establishment of the date for the second round of the presidential
elections as “a step in the right direction.” The OAS Mission encouraged Haitians
to participate in the forthcoming elections and stated that it hopes that the
two candidates will be fully engaged. The EU Observation Mission stated
that it was “now essential
that the process be completed,” and that a second round be held that “in
conformity with constitutional deadlines.” The EU Mission additionally claimed
that the irregularities found by the Commission had not “put into question the
results of the first round.”
The
U.S. government likewise hailed
the new date for the second tour of the presidential elections, announcing that
it “awaits with impatience” the termination of the electoral processes. In a statement
released Thursday, State Department spokesperson John Kirby seconded the calls
of the Core Group for a peaceful and calm transition of power on February
7. Ban Ki Moon, the Secretary General of
the UN, expressed
concern over the deepening electoral crisis in Haiti and called on all
political actors to work together towards a completion of the process in a
credible, transparent, and inclusive manner.
Even
if the second round presidential election goes ahead as planned on January 24, many
argue
that there is not enough time to meet the February 7 constitutional deadline, which
calls for Martelly to transfer power to an elected successor. The insistence of
foreign observers and diplomats on a strict adherence to the constitutional
calendar therefore effectively rules out the possibility of implementing the
Commission’s recommendations, or any other measures to re-establish the
credibility of the process.
If
the electoral process is not complete by February 7, it will fall to the
legislature to name a provisional president. Anticipating such an eventuality,
President Martelly rushed to swear-in the 92 deputies and 14 senators elected
so far over the weekend, in spite of the Commission calling for an “in-depth
evaluation” of accusations that several parliamentary candidates bribed the CEP
in order to win their seats. One diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity, warned
of an “immense crisis” that will result with the election of “a president and a
government that will have only very weak credibility, and will thus be
contested in the streets.”
The
new legislature does not bring any changes for the position of Haitian women in
politics. Despite obligatory constitutional quotas
and public education campaigns,
women are effectively absent in the new Parliament, following the publication
of the final results of the October elections in Le Moniteur. Out of the 92 deputies sworn in so far, there are only
two women. In the Senate, there are no women senators among
its 24 members.
No comments:
Post a Comment